This website uses cookies
More information
Site Filter — Worldwide / All Aircraft
NBAA unimpressed with FAA over Hampton ruling
The underlying litigation responded to an attempt by the town of East Hampton to impose a series of noise and access restrictions at HTO. Ultimately, the federal courts agreed with NBAA and they have been lifted.

The NBAA has expressed disappointment with a recent FAA decision that allows the town of East Hampton in New York state to use airport funds to pay for legal fees stemming from its unsuccessful effort to impose access restrictions at East Hampton airport (HTO).

NBAA, in an appeal to the FAA of an administrative decision released in 2018, had maintained and continues to maintain that the town's use of airport revenue to pay for its legal fees is contrary to agency precedent, is bad policy and is at odds with congressional instructions. On 23 July the FAA released a final decision that found this misappropriation of funds by the town of East Hampton to be permissible.

“We are disappointed with the FAA's decision,” says NBAA president and CEO Ed Bolen. “Operators at HTO were effectively double-charged in the fight for their right to use the airport. The town of East Hampton significantly raised the landing fees at HTO to generate additional revenue at the same time that it was incurring the legal expenses associated with defending the unauthorised restrictions.”

The underlying litigation responded to an attempt by the town of East Hampton to impose a series of noise and access restrictions at HTO. Ultimately, the federal courts agreed with NBAA and local aviation operators that the restrictions violated federal requirements, and they have since been lifted.

In its appeal to the FAA, NBAA emphasised that East Hampton had been advised by its own counsel that the proposed restrictions were illegal, and that prior federal guidance had made clear that airport revenue can be used only for the benefit of an airport. NBAA stated that “the town had an explicit anti-airport and bad faith agenda. The town openly refused to utilise the opportunities provided by, much less comply with, the applicable federal laws… the FAA is unlikely to ever have before it, in its own words, a clearer ‘unique’ case of the 'abuse' of airport accounts to fund impermissible legal expenditures.”

“The FAA's recent decision essentially allows East Hampton to use airport monies to defend the indefensible, burdening the airport users with the costs,” notes Bolen, adding that NBAA, on behalf of its members and the many operators who utilise HTO and other airports across the nation, will continue to insist that FAA and airport sponsors promote the responsible use of airport funds.

Other News
 
Capitol Hill reintroduces ALIGN to delight of NBAA
May 3, 2021
Immediate expensing allows eligible taxpayers to deduct the full cost of qualifying capital equipment, including new and used business aircraft, in the first year of ownership. It is part of the ALIGN Act, popular with NBAA.
NBAA sustainable flight department accreditation program launches
May 3, 2021
EU Summit lays out plans for sustainable fuels
April 25, 2021
The largest potential reduction in aviation's green house gas emissions, and key to reaching goals to reduce them, will come about through the broad adoption of SAF, according to the EU's private aviation SAF Summit.
NBAA and AOPA express GPS jamming concerns
March 15, 2021
Dickson to impart wisdom at NBAA virtual event
February 22, 2021
The Virtual Business Aviation Town Hall marks Steve Dickson's second NBAA appearance, following an August 2020 discussion that addressed COVID-related topics. The upcoming event will have time for questions.
NBAA applauds IRS role in clarifying tax obligations
January 15, 2021