This website uses cookies
More information
Business Air News Bulletin
Business Air News Bulletin
The monthly news publication for aviation professionals.

Why visit ACE ’24?

Related background information from the Handbook...
The monthly news publication for aviation professionals.

Request your printed copy

NBAA unimpressed with FAA over Hampton ruling
The underlying litigation responded to an attempt by the town of East Hampton to impose a series of noise and access restrictions at HTO. Ultimately, the federal courts agreed with NBAA and they have been lifted.

The NBAA has expressed disappointment with a recent FAA decision that allows the town of East Hampton in New York state to use airport funds to pay for legal fees stemming from its unsuccessful effort to impose access restrictions at East Hampton airport (HTO).

NBAA, in an appeal to the FAA of an administrative decision released in 2018, had maintained and continues to maintain that the town's use of airport revenue to pay for its legal fees is contrary to agency precedent, is bad policy and is at odds with congressional instructions. On 23 July the FAA released a final decision that found this misappropriation of funds by the town of East Hampton to be permissible.

“We are disappointed with the FAA's decision,” says NBAA president and CEO Ed Bolen. “Operators at HTO were effectively double-charged in the fight for their right to use the airport. The town of East Hampton significantly raised the landing fees at HTO to generate additional revenue at the same time that it was incurring the legal expenses associated with defending the unauthorised restrictions.”

The underlying litigation responded to an attempt by the town of East Hampton to impose a series of noise and access restrictions at HTO. Ultimately, the federal courts agreed with NBAA and local aviation operators that the restrictions violated federal requirements, and they have since been lifted.

In its appeal to the FAA, NBAA emphasised that East Hampton had been advised by its own counsel that the proposed restrictions were illegal, and that prior federal guidance had made clear that airport revenue can be used only for the benefit of an airport. NBAA stated that “the town had an explicit anti-airport and bad faith agenda. The town openly refused to utilise the opportunities provided by, much less comply with, the applicable federal laws… the FAA is unlikely to ever have before it, in its own words, a clearer ‘unique’ case of the 'abuse' of airport accounts to fund impermissible legal expenditures.”

“The FAA's recent decision essentially allows East Hampton to use airport monies to defend the indefensible, burdening the airport users with the costs,” notes Bolen, adding that NBAA, on behalf of its members and the many operators who utilise HTO and other airports across the nation, will continue to insist that FAA and airport sponsors promote the responsible use of airport funds.

Other News
 
White Plains Forum highlights industry's passion and promise
June 20, 2024
Airports honoured for snow and ice control
June 17, 2024
UK entry changes may catch operators unaware
June 11, 2024
GAR submissions are simple but will take time to get used to, and the UK's ETA programme is to expand beyond current requirements. While not particularly onerous, non-compliance means fines or delays in entry.
NBAA lauds move to preserve business access to Dublin
May 2, 2024
The IAA draft decision is that the airport's current cap at 32m passengers annually would only apply to the two commercial airline passenger terminals, preserving GA and business aviation access to 29 March, 2025.