This website uses cookies
More information
Business Air News
Business Air News
The monthly news publication for aviation professionals.

Why visit ACE ’24?

Related background information from the Handbook...
The monthly news publication for aviation professionals.

Request your printed copy

NATA welcomes FAA guidance on shared flight expenses
Can a pilot share flight expenses? NATA is advised that holding out to the public, without having an operator's certificate, is prohibited; and using internet-based platforms to advertise flights constitutes holding out.

In response to a directive from the FAA Reauthorisation Act of 2018, NATA has welcomed an advisory circular (AC) released by the FAA this week clarifying acceptable sharing of flight expenses. As expected, the AC affirms the longstanding precedent and policy from the FAA: holding out to the general public, including through the use of a website or app, without an operator's certificate, is prohibited. The legislation requiring the publication of this guidance was the result of a provision supported by NATA to give pilots better clarity on permissible flight sharing scenarios, and also required a yet to be released study by the Government Accountability Office for which NATA was extensively interviewed.

“The FAA outlines specific scenarios to demonstrate what is and is not permissible. We expect that pilots will find this useful in understanding the concepts of holding out and common carriage. NATA hopes this enables pilots to make better decisions in this area to avoid enforcement actions that would jeopardise their future ability to fly,” states NATA president and CEO Timothy Obitts. “This is another great example of the FAA working in concert with the industry to educate owners and pilots, and help put an end to uncertified charter operations.”

In the new AC, the FAA confirmed that using internet-based platforms like social media, websites or apps to advertise flights constitutes 'holding out' and is therefore prohibited. Private pilots, however, are still able to share specific costs of the flight only if the non-flying party pays no less than the pro rata share. In reaffirming that stipulation, however, the FAA reminded pilots that examples of this type of pro rata flight sharing is an extremely narrow exemption carved out for limited circumstances, including a bona fide common purpose. NATA encourages pilots to review the advisory circular.

Other News
 
Air Charter Summit highlights community as catalyst for safety and success
July 16, 2024
NATA's Summit provided a forum for discussion on timely topics and direct connections between federal agencies and the Part 135 community.
NATA elects three new members to board
July 1, 2024
NBAA and NATA respond to FAA public charter plans
June 20, 2024
NBAA queries further regulation of flights critical to communities, while NATA is committed to safeguarding the Part 135 environment from changes that may jeopardise the safety or success of aviation businesses.
Reauthorisation strengthens and advances the FAA
May 20, 2024
GAMA and NBAA respond to FAA SMS final rule
April 26, 2024
The rule requires all Part 135 operators, certain Part 21 certificate holders and §91.147 air tour operators to implement an SMS, expanding existing FAR Part 5 SMS requirements and adding some new mandates to Part 5.
Brendel moves up in NATA member services
April 16, 2024