This website uses cookies
More information
Business Air News Bulletin
Business Air News Bulletin
The monthly news publication for aviation professionals.
Related background information from the Handbook...
The monthly news publication for aviation professionals.

Request your printed copy

NATA welcomes FAA guidance on shared flight expenses
Can a pilot share flight expenses? NATA is advised that holding out to the public, without having an operator's certificate, is prohibited; and using internet-based platforms to advertise flights constitutes holding out.

In response to a directive from the FAA Reauthorisation Act of 2018, NATA has welcomed an advisory circular (AC) released by the FAA this week clarifying acceptable sharing of flight expenses. As expected, the AC affirms the longstanding precedent and policy from the FAA: holding out to the general public, including through the use of a website or app, without an operator's certificate, is prohibited. The legislation requiring the publication of this guidance was the result of a provision supported by NATA to give pilots better clarity on permissible flight sharing scenarios, and also required a yet to be released study by the Government Accountability Office for which NATA was extensively interviewed.

“The FAA outlines specific scenarios to demonstrate what is and is not permissible. We expect that pilots will find this useful in understanding the concepts of holding out and common carriage. NATA hopes this enables pilots to make better decisions in this area to avoid enforcement actions that would jeopardise their future ability to fly,” states NATA president and CEO Timothy Obitts. “This is another great example of the FAA working in concert with the industry to educate owners and pilots, and help put an end to uncertified charter operations.”

In the new AC, the FAA confirmed that using internet-based platforms like social media, websites or apps to advertise flights constitutes 'holding out' and is therefore prohibited. Private pilots, however, are still able to share specific costs of the flight only if the non-flying party pays no less than the pro rata share. In reaffirming that stipulation, however, the FAA reminded pilots that examples of this type of pro rata flight sharing is an extremely narrow exemption carved out for limited circumstances, including a bona fide common purpose. NATA encourages pilots to review the advisory circular.

Other News
NATA rebrand reinforces mission as business aviation advocate
September 19, 2023
The organisation has updated its branding and shortened its name to reinforce its mission and reflect industry growth and advancement.
US associations await confirmation of Whitaker as FAA administrator
September 19, 2023
Aviation groups question regulatory overhaul for flights vital to underserved communities
August 30, 2023
They have committed to discussion about the repercussions of any regulatory action by the FAA following inaccurate characterisation of Part 135 carriers who conduct public charter flights under DOT Part 380 regs.
Associations push for clear flight plan for AAM take off
August 17, 2023
Coalition looks to clear up Part 380 regulations
July 3, 2023
NATA adds five to the board
June 27, 2023