ACE 2026 - The home of global charter.
The bimonthly news publication for aviation professionals.
This year’s business aircraft handling
survey attracted a wide variety
of votes from Europe’s private
pilots, and produced some very
interesting results.
One pilot, who elected to remain
anonymous, told us: “FBOs
invariably offer the right facilities –
TV, lounge, weather briefing, fax,
phone, boardroom etc – but you
often have to dig around for them to
be made available to you. Usually if
you want weather, for example, the
staff will get it for you but no more
and no less.”
The pilot in question continued:
“I’m an owner pilot and wherever I
go, I commute to.
“My aircraft is my car and
my requirements are very different
from those of a corporate aircraft,
where there are two hired helps
carrying the owner.
“I tend to do my own weather
briefing, which is fine, and all I really
want from an FBO is a very simple,
seamless service.
“I just want to transit the airport
as quickly as possible and I don’t
want to pay through the nose for the
privilege. After all, I don’t have
passengers using lounges, I never sit
down and avail myself of the
facilities, yet still the charges are
prohibitively high.”
In this pilot’s mind, at least, the
European fixed base operations
arena has room and indeed a need
for a two-tier pricing system – one for
full-service FBOs and one for
limited-service FBOs.
He continued: “If you’ve got six
passengers who are all going to
sit and drink coffee for an hour
before the flights, then great, you
need the facility.
“But if you’re like me – and there
are a lot of owner pilots in my
position – you just want to get in your
aircraft and go.
“So why not have a two-tier
system for FBOs, more in line with
the service you require?”
Our anonymous pilot says this
issue is quite simply one of value
for money.
He added: “What’s the point in
paying a nice, cheap landing fee if
you’re still going to be hit with a £250
walk-through charge?”